Which statement regarding organization access is not true?

The focus of the question is on understanding the nature of organization access and identifying which statement does not accurately reflect its characteristics. The correct choice indicates a misunderstanding of how access permissions are typically structured within an organization.

The concept of organization access generally includes rules that define who can view or modify travel documents based on established hierarchies. Therefore, the notion that access is granted or restricted based on organizational hierarchy is fundamentally accurate. This structure ensures that individuals in higher positions may have broader access compared to those in lower levels, reflecting typical management practices and data security measures.

In contrast, the other statements focus on the functions and implications of access permissions. For example, the ability for individuals to manage their travel documents independently is a standard feature of access systems, enhancing user autonomy. Similarly, permission levels can indeed dictate what actions a user can take, with a level 0 designation often implying unrestricted access. The assertion that one can edit others' travel documents once granted access also aligns with common practices in collaborative environments where shared document management is frequent.

The misunderstanding lies in assuming that organizational hierarchy does not play a role in access permissions, which is a fundamental aspect of how organizational access is typically structured.